dc marker Search Results


90
Becton Dickinson fitc-labeled mab specific dc maturation markers
Fitc Labeled Mab Specific Dc Maturation Markers, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitc-labeled mab specific dc maturation markers/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc-labeled mab specific dc maturation markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson dc markers anti-cd11cαchain apc
Dc Markers Anti Cd11cαchain Apc, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dc markers anti-cd11cαchain apc/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dc markers anti-cd11cαchain apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson pe-labeled mab specific dc maturation markers
Pe Labeled Mab Specific Dc Maturation Markers, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe-labeled mab specific dc maturation markers/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe-labeled mab specific dc maturation markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Human Protein Atlas heatmap of 114 significantly differentially expressed genes (degs) between dc subsets across 374 cd markers
CD11c − CD303 + pDC, CD11c + CD141 + cDC1, CD11c + CD1c + cDC2 and CD11c + CD14 + CD206 + moDC were flow cytometrically sorted from human PBMC as outlined in Supplementary Fig. . Cells were co-cultured with activated- or naive CD4 + T-cells overnight, then stained with antibody to β2m- conjugated to hashtag oligonucleotides (HTO) 1-8 and oligo-tagged antibody to CD3. After extensive washing steps, HTO 1-8 tagged samples were pooled in equal proportion and loaded on a 10X Genomics platform. a tSNE plots highlighting the mRNA expression profiles of pDC, cDC1, cDC2 and moDC subsets individually. Red color indicates DC co-cultured with activated (a)CD4 + T-cells. Blue color indicates DC co-cultured with naive (n)CD4 + T-cells. b GO biological process analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) using the 577 DEGs of the cDC1 “help” signature. c Dot plot depicting transcript levels and percentage of cells expressing genes related to key pathways of “antigen processing-cross presentation”, “DC maturation/migration” and “T cell differentiation/recruitment” as identified in the cDC1 “help” signature. d <t>Heatmap</t> revealing top 100 upregulated DEGs in the cDC1 “help” signature as derived from comparing activated CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO2) versus naïve CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO6).
Heatmap Of 114 Significantly Differentially Expressed Genes (Degs) Between Dc Subsets Across 374 Cd Markers, supplied by Human Protein Atlas, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/heatmap of 114 significantly differentially expressed genes (degs) between dc subsets across 374 cd markers/product/Human Protein Atlas
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
heatmap of 114 significantly differentially expressed genes (degs) between dc subsets across 374 cd markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson dc-sign marker
CD11c − CD303 + pDC, CD11c + CD141 + cDC1, CD11c + CD1c + cDC2 and CD11c + CD14 + CD206 + moDC were flow cytometrically sorted from human PBMC as outlined in Supplementary Fig. . Cells were co-cultured with activated- or naive CD4 + T-cells overnight, then stained with antibody to β2m- conjugated to hashtag oligonucleotides (HTO) 1-8 and oligo-tagged antibody to CD3. After extensive washing steps, HTO 1-8 tagged samples were pooled in equal proportion and loaded on a 10X Genomics platform. a tSNE plots highlighting the mRNA expression profiles of pDC, cDC1, cDC2 and moDC subsets individually. Red color indicates DC co-cultured with activated (a)CD4 + T-cells. Blue color indicates DC co-cultured with naive (n)CD4 + T-cells. b GO biological process analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) using the 577 DEGs of the cDC1 “help” signature. c Dot plot depicting transcript levels and percentage of cells expressing genes related to key pathways of “antigen processing-cross presentation”, “DC maturation/migration” and “T cell differentiation/recruitment” as identified in the cDC1 “help” signature. d <t>Heatmap</t> revealing top 100 upregulated DEGs in the cDC1 “help” signature as derived from comparing activated CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO2) versus naïve CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO6).
Dc Sign Marker, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dc-sign marker/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dc-sign marker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson pe-conjugated mabs against dc cell surface markers
DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; <t>FL2-H)</t> <t>conjugated</t> <t>mAbs</t> as indicated and analyzed by FACS.
Pe Conjugated Mabs Against Dc Cell Surface Markers, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe-conjugated mabs against dc cell surface markers/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe-conjugated mabs against dc cell surface markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Selvita Inc dc maturation markers
DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; <t>FL2-H)</t> <t>conjugated</t> <t>mAbs</t> as indicated and analyzed by FACS.
Dc Maturation Markers, supplied by Selvita Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dc maturation markers/product/Selvita Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dc maturation markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Dendritics intracellular dc-lamp maturation marker
DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; <t>FL2-H)</t> <t>conjugated</t> <t>mAbs</t> as indicated and analyzed by FACS.
Intracellular Dc Lamp Maturation Marker, supplied by Dendritics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/intracellular dc-lamp maturation marker/product/Dendritics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
intracellular dc-lamp maturation marker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson monoclonal antibody pairs for activation markers cd3/hla-dr
DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; <t>FL2-H)</t> <t>conjugated</t> <t>mAbs</t> as indicated and analyzed by FACS.
Monoclonal Antibody Pairs For Activation Markers Cd3/Hla Dr, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/monoclonal antibody pairs for activation markers cd3/hla-dr/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal antibody pairs for activation markers cd3/hla-dr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Henkel Corporation rna levels for dc markers
DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; <t>FL2-H)</t> <t>conjugated</t> <t>mAbs</t> as indicated and analyzed by FACS.
Rna Levels For Dc Markers, supplied by Henkel Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rna levels for dc markers/product/Henkel Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna levels for dc markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


CD11c − CD303 + pDC, CD11c + CD141 + cDC1, CD11c + CD1c + cDC2 and CD11c + CD14 + CD206 + moDC were flow cytometrically sorted from human PBMC as outlined in Supplementary Fig. . Cells were co-cultured with activated- or naive CD4 + T-cells overnight, then stained with antibody to β2m- conjugated to hashtag oligonucleotides (HTO) 1-8 and oligo-tagged antibody to CD3. After extensive washing steps, HTO 1-8 tagged samples were pooled in equal proportion and loaded on a 10X Genomics platform. a tSNE plots highlighting the mRNA expression profiles of pDC, cDC1, cDC2 and moDC subsets individually. Red color indicates DC co-cultured with activated (a)CD4 + T-cells. Blue color indicates DC co-cultured with naive (n)CD4 + T-cells. b GO biological process analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) using the 577 DEGs of the cDC1 “help” signature. c Dot plot depicting transcript levels and percentage of cells expressing genes related to key pathways of “antigen processing-cross presentation”, “DC maturation/migration” and “T cell differentiation/recruitment” as identified in the cDC1 “help” signature. d Heatmap revealing top 100 upregulated DEGs in the cDC1 “help” signature as derived from comparing activated CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO2) versus naïve CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO6).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: CD4 + helper T cells endow cDC1 with cancer-impeding functions in the human tumor micro-environment

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35615-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: CD11c − CD303 + pDC, CD11c + CD141 + cDC1, CD11c + CD1c + cDC2 and CD11c + CD14 + CD206 + moDC were flow cytometrically sorted from human PBMC as outlined in Supplementary Fig. . Cells were co-cultured with activated- or naive CD4 + T-cells overnight, then stained with antibody to β2m- conjugated to hashtag oligonucleotides (HTO) 1-8 and oligo-tagged antibody to CD3. After extensive washing steps, HTO 1-8 tagged samples were pooled in equal proportion and loaded on a 10X Genomics platform. a tSNE plots highlighting the mRNA expression profiles of pDC, cDC1, cDC2 and moDC subsets individually. Red color indicates DC co-cultured with activated (a)CD4 + T-cells. Blue color indicates DC co-cultured with naive (n)CD4 + T-cells. b GO biological process analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) using the 577 DEGs of the cDC1 “help” signature. c Dot plot depicting transcript levels and percentage of cells expressing genes related to key pathways of “antigen processing-cross presentation”, “DC maturation/migration” and “T cell differentiation/recruitment” as identified in the cDC1 “help” signature. d Heatmap revealing top 100 upregulated DEGs in the cDC1 “help” signature as derived from comparing activated CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO2) versus naïve CD4 + T-cell treated cDC1 (HTO6).

Article Snippet: Heatmap of 114 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DC subsets across 374 CD markers from Human Protein Atlas was generated based on log 2 FC using Qlucore Omics Explorer (version 3.7).

Techniques: Cell Culture, Staining, Expressing, Migration, Cell Differentiation, Derivative Assay

To investigate the relationship between “helped” cDC1 and tumor-infiltrating DC that are conserved across multiple human solid tumor types, the cDC1 “help” signature was cross-compared with a tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature from Gerhard et al. and with tumor-infiltrating DC signatures of 8 different states that are associated with either longer or shorter overall patient survival from Luca et al. . a Venn diagram depicting number of overlapping genes between the cDC1 “help” signature and the tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature. b Heatmaps depicting the expression of tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature genes in each DC subset under “help” (aCD4 + T) or “no help” (nCD4 + T) conditions. c Heatmap depicting the expression of signature genes from the indicated tumor-infiltrating DC states (DC_S3 etc.) that are associated with longer or shorter overall survival (OS) in cDC1 under “help” (aCD4 + T) or “no help” (nCD4 + T) conditions. d Venn diagrams depicting numbers of overlapping genes between the cDC1 “help” signature and the tumor-infiltrating DC signatures of 8 different states defined in the study of Luca et al. .

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: CD4 + helper T cells endow cDC1 with cancer-impeding functions in the human tumor micro-environment

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35615-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: To investigate the relationship between “helped” cDC1 and tumor-infiltrating DC that are conserved across multiple human solid tumor types, the cDC1 “help” signature was cross-compared with a tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature from Gerhard et al. and with tumor-infiltrating DC signatures of 8 different states that are associated with either longer or shorter overall patient survival from Luca et al. . a Venn diagram depicting number of overlapping genes between the cDC1 “help” signature and the tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature. b Heatmaps depicting the expression of tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature genes in each DC subset under “help” (aCD4 + T) or “no help” (nCD4 + T) conditions. c Heatmap depicting the expression of signature genes from the indicated tumor-infiltrating DC states (DC_S3 etc.) that are associated with longer or shorter overall survival (OS) in cDC1 under “help” (aCD4 + T) or “no help” (nCD4 + T) conditions. d Venn diagrams depicting numbers of overlapping genes between the cDC1 “help” signature and the tumor-infiltrating DC signatures of 8 different states defined in the study of Luca et al. .

Article Snippet: Heatmap of 114 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DC subsets across 374 CD markers from Human Protein Atlas was generated based on log 2 FC using Qlucore Omics Explorer (version 3.7).

Techniques: Expressing

a Heatmap depicting the expression of shared genes between cDC1 “help” signature and tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 signature (66 genes) in cDC1 under “help” (aCD4 + T) or “no help” (nCD4 + T) conditions. b – e Pearson’s correlations between ( b ) tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature , ( c ) tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 signature , ( d ) cDC1 “help” signature or ( e ) shared signature between “helped” cDC1 and tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 and defined tumor infiltrating T-cell signatures denoting activated ( a ) and effector memory (EM) CD8 + T-cells and Th1 and Th2 CD4 + T-cells within TCGA SKCM dataset ( n = 458). R, correlation coefficient. f , g Kaplan–Meier curves revealing prognostic/predictive value of tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature , tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 signature , cDC1 “help” signature or shared signature between “helped” cDC1 and tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 for ( f ) melanoma patient’s OS in TCGA SKCM cohort ( n = 458; baseline transcriptome), or ( g ) response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy ( n = 41; baseline transcriptome). High or low metagene expression subgroups of patients were based on a median expression cut-off. p -value was calculated using Log-rank test/Mantel-Cox test (TCGA SKCM cohort) or CoxPh hazard ratios (HR), depicted as Z-scores in the anti-PD1 immunotherapy trial ( p < 0.05 is considered significant).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: CD4 + helper T cells endow cDC1 with cancer-impeding functions in the human tumor micro-environment

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35615-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Heatmap depicting the expression of shared genes between cDC1 “help” signature and tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 signature (66 genes) in cDC1 under “help” (aCD4 + T) or “no help” (nCD4 + T) conditions. b – e Pearson’s correlations between ( b ) tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature , ( c ) tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 signature , ( d ) cDC1 “help” signature or ( e ) shared signature between “helped” cDC1 and tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 and defined tumor infiltrating T-cell signatures denoting activated ( a ) and effector memory (EM) CD8 + T-cells and Th1 and Th2 CD4 + T-cells within TCGA SKCM dataset ( n = 458). R, correlation coefficient. f , g Kaplan–Meier curves revealing prognostic/predictive value of tumor-infiltrating DC3 signature , tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 signature , cDC1 “help” signature or shared signature between “helped” cDC1 and tumor-infiltrating DC_S3 for ( f ) melanoma patient’s OS in TCGA SKCM cohort ( n = 458; baseline transcriptome), or ( g ) response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy ( n = 41; baseline transcriptome). High or low metagene expression subgroups of patients were based on a median expression cut-off. p -value was calculated using Log-rank test/Mantel-Cox test (TCGA SKCM cohort) or CoxPh hazard ratios (HR), depicted as Z-scores in the anti-PD1 immunotherapy trial ( p < 0.05 is considered significant).

Article Snippet: Heatmap of 114 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DC subsets across 374 CD markers from Human Protein Atlas was generated based on log 2 FC using Qlucore Omics Explorer (version 3.7).

Techniques: Expressing

DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; FL2-H) conjugated mAbs as indicated and analyzed by FACS.

Journal:

Article Title: Hybrids of Dendritic Cells and Tumor Cells Generated by Electrofusion Simultaneously Present Immunodominant Epitopes from Multiple Human Tumor-Associated Antigens in the Context of MHC Class I and Class II Molecules 1

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: DC phenotype before electrofusion. DCs from donor 4 were stained with FITC- (x-axis; FL1-H) and PE- (y-axis; FL2-H) conjugated mAbs as indicated and analyzed by FACS.

Article Snippet: After fusion, DC-888mel hybrids were detected by staining with PE-conjugated mAbs against DC cell surface markers including CD11c, CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83, and HLA-DR (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Electrofusion, Staining

FACS analyses of DC-TC hybrid cells generated by electrofusion. 888 melanoma cells were labeled with CFSE (x-axis; FL1-H) and were fused with DCs from donor 4. After overnight culture, both adherent and nonadherent cell populations were stained with PE- (y-axis; FL2-H) conjugated mAbs as indicated.

Journal:

Article Title: Hybrids of Dendritic Cells and Tumor Cells Generated by Electrofusion Simultaneously Present Immunodominant Epitopes from Multiple Human Tumor-Associated Antigens in the Context of MHC Class I and Class II Molecules 1

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: FACS analyses of DC-TC hybrid cells generated by electrofusion. 888 melanoma cells were labeled with CFSE (x-axis; FL1-H) and were fused with DCs from donor 4. After overnight culture, both adherent and nonadherent cell populations were stained with PE- (y-axis; FL2-H) conjugated mAbs as indicated.

Article Snippet: After fusion, DC-888mel hybrids were detected by staining with PE-conjugated mAbs against DC cell surface markers including CD11c, CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83, and HLA-DR (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Generated, Electrofusion, Labeling, Staining